[Moon] [Moon-Net] 23 cm EME

Lars Pettersson sm4ive at telia.com
Wed Nov 20 18:24:38 CET 2019


Peter and all

if i remeber correct ARRL was 1 part in spring  may  around 1980-82 or 
so   i could be wrong    but spring might be a solution for less bad wx

just !!!!!

Lars

Den 2019-11-20 kl. 18:13, skrev Peter Blair:
> Hi All, Personally I would be against this simply because in October / 
> November in this part of Western Europe our typical weather patterns 
> mean that you can easily have a whole weekend of gales so you get no 
> 23cm /70cm score at all. Believe me, Ive been operating this contest 
> since it started and we have had that happen more than once.
> The ARI  contest weekend here, Sept 28/29 was a complete wipeout , I 
> got 4 hours of operation only.  I suspect the PA, ON and N France guys 
> would feel the same. Two weekends means you have a good chance of 
> avoiding that.
>  I have the feeling that there are more people operating both CW and 
> digital than there were, say 10 years ago, which is surely what we 
> want to see.
> 73 Peter G3LTF
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Stig Larsson via Moon
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 2:45 PM
> To: Lars Pettersson
> Cc: moon at moonbounce.info ; Moon Net
> Subject: Re: [Moon] [Moon-Net] 23 cm EME
>
> Hi all!
>
> I I just want to say that I agree with Lars that 1 contest weekend for
> Digital and one for CW is preferred and that it is allowed to run the 
> same
> station both on CW and Digital. That would stimulate the activity on both
> weekends for the Mode Category All and CW only. You could also have new
> Mode Category "Digital only"!
>
> 73 Stig SM4GGC
>
> Den ons 20 nov. 2019 kl 14:51 skrev Lars Pettersson via Moon-net <
> moon-net at mailman.pe1itr.com>:
>
>> This years ARRL
>>
>> I worked 94 Qso and 37 multi CW only   i did not spend so much time i
>> dont have the energy any more , To bad that one have to ask stations on
>> HB9 chatt to be able to do CW.
>>
>> my 2010 result 117 Q   was without any chatt and 100% random
>>
>> I belive if my halftime working LNA had been ok maybe some more weakies
>> had been  possible. At least 5 more that i know called but due to bad
>> LNA only traces.
>>
>> Today i tested to se moon noise and it was not detected and reciver
>> noise was S9  hmmm good oscilator maybe. Anyhow i got help from SM4EMO
>> to climb my service tower to take down my LNA since i dont want to risk
>> my recent Hip surgery  (8 weeks) today.
>>
>> Anyhow i did get the following new # in oct contest RA4HL
>> FR5DN,G0LBK,BD4SY,ES3RF ,  and i worked the following after oct contest
>> A21EME 4X1AJ.
>>
>> in Nov i added WB8HRW DJ3JJ AA4MD KN0WS WK9P    so 12 new # are OK.
>>
>> I would prefer that ARRL changed the contest  like foe example OCT  part
>> Digital only   and Nov Analog only.  And despite its a US contest the
>> participants from US are terrible low.
>>
>> 73 Lars SM4IVE
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moon-Net posting and subscription instructions are at
>> http://www.nlsa.com/nets/moon-net-help.html
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Moon mailing list
> Moon at moonbounce.info
> /mailman/listinfo/moon
>
> Join eQSL.cc  https://eqsl.cc/qslcard/Index.cfm
>
>


More information about the Moon mailing list